FAQ
Do I need a financial advisor if I already use a robo-advisor?
Robo-advisors are great for low-cost, rules-based investing. Where they often fall short is planning: tax strategy, equity compensation, retirement income sequencing, insurance decisions, and major life events. Many people use robo-advisors for the portfolio and an advisor for the strategy.
How do I know if an advisor is “worth it”?
Ask what they actually do beyond picking investments. The highest value usually comes from tax planning, behavior coaching, and decision support during major financial events (job change, liquidity event, early retirement, business sale, etc.). If the advisor can help you avoid one big mistake, the ROI can dwarf the fee.
What’s the biggest DIY risk for high earners?
It’s rarely a lack of investing knowledge. It’s blind spots: taxes, concentration risk (company stock), account structure, and poor coordination between goals. High income can hide structural problems, until a downturn or tax surprise exposes them.
Is a fee-only advisor better than an AUM advisor?
Not always, different models fit different needs. Fee-only can be great for one-time plans or periodic check-ins. AUM can make sense when you want ongoing management, tax coordination, and accountability. The key is clarity on services, conflicts, and total cost.
What is the best “hybrid” setup?
A common hybrid structure is: automate saving + invest in low-cost diversified funds, then hire a professional for targeted work like tax projections, equity comp planning, retirement drawdown strategy, insurance review, and estate coordination.
