Leadership & the Rich Life

You've Outgrown How It Works: Leading Your Team, and Yourself, Through the Next Leap | Ep #68

Written By: Dan Pascone
A lot of high performers are quietly sitting on two versions of the same tension. On our recent episode with leadership development partner Rachel Wexler, who spent 25 years running product and strategy before building her own practice, we dug into both. Here is the written version.
TL;DR: The team you lead has outgrown how it used to work, and the bigger personal leap you keep circling never gets the green light from the data. These look like two problems. They are the same one: a hard conversation you keep avoiding, at work or with yourself. The fix in both cases is the same, facing a discomfort you cannot analyze your way out of.

- The first sign a team has outgrown how it works: the real conversation moves from the room to the hallway.

- Healthy conflict is a muscle, not a value on a wall. The leader builds it by going first: open to feedback, questioning, and being vulnerable.

- There is never a right time for the leap. You cannot erase the risk, only mitigate it, then decide with more than a spreadsheet.

At work, you are leading a team where the personalities that used to tolerate each other now grate, and the important conversations happen in the corners instead of the room. Personally, you are circling a bigger move of your own, waiting for a right time the data never quite delivers. Both are worth facing head on. Let's take them in turn, then show why they are really one skill.

The two tensions are the same problem

Rachel's whole practice sits on one line: she helps teams that have outgrown the ways they work together unlock the next level of performance their business now demands. What struck us is how neatly that describes the personal version too. You outgrow a job the same way a team outgrows its habits. What worked last year stops hitting the right note, and the fix is uncomfortable enough that most people avoid it. Organizations love to say they want healthy conflict, and individuals love to say they want the leap. Very few live either one. The reason is the same in both cases: humans are wired for safety, and the honest conversation, with your team or with yourself, feels unsafe. Naming that is the whole game.

How to tell your team has outgrown how it works

Rachel's read on a fracturing team is not about what people say. It is about what you notice underneath. Good leaders start with strong one-on-one relationships, so they know how each person shows up authentically.

The warning signs appear when people stop being that authentic self in the group:

Body language shifts.

- People tense up, glance at each other across the table, or quietly pick up their phones and move the conversation to Slack.

The real talk moves to the hallway.

- When the honest version of the discussion happens in the corners and after work instead of in the room, trust has thinned.

Strengths curdle under stress.

- Everyone's greatest strength, pushed by tension, becomes their Achilles heel and the elephant in the room.

Here is the contrast to watch for:
Signal
A team that's outgrown how it works
A team operating at its next level
Where decisions really happen
In the hallway, after the meeting
In the room, out loud
Conflict
Avoided, or personal
Healthy, about the work
Feedback to the leader
Filtered or withheld
Direct and expected
After a decision
Quiet resistance
Disagree and commit
Energy
Guarded
Candid and engaged

Building healthy conflict that a team actually lives

Healthy conflict is a muscle, and Rachel is clear that it takes intentional practice because we are wired to avoid making each other uncomfortable. A few things build it for real, not just on a poster:

1. The leader goes first.

-When the leader is openly receptive to feedback, questioning, and being vulnerable, it gives everyone else permission to do the same.

2. Assume positive intent.

-Trust and the assumption of good faith are what let people say the hard thing without it becoming personal.

3. Get under the surface.

-Teams are good at logistics and what has to happen. The value is in the root cause underneath, which takes deliberate effort to reach.

4. Run a pre-mortem.

-Ask, out loud, how could this fail? Listing every way a plan could break surfaces the disagreement that politeness would otherwise bury.

5. Play the other side.

-When a room is already aligned, we assign someone to argue the opposite, even if they agree, so a shared blind spot does not slip through.

6. Disagree and commit.

-You do not need unanimity. Build toward consensus, or at least know exactly where each person stands, let everyone be heard, then make the call and move as one. You do not have to like each other, but you do have to respect each other. For the research behind why trust and candor drive team performance, Harvard Business Review has covered it well.

The harder conversation: the one with yourself

The same person who can build candor on a team often cannot have the honest conversation about their own next chapter. Rachel knew a decade before she left that she wanted to go out on her own, and it still took another eight to ten years and a milestone birthday to actually move. Her friend's line is the one worth keeping: there is never going to be a right time. You will never have amassed every experience, traveled everywhere, or banked all the money first. We gather ideas with data, but we make the decision with the heart. That does not mean leap blind. It means you can mitigate the risks, but you cannot erase them, and at some point you have to face the fear you cannot analyze anymore. This is the same wiring we see when investors freeze in a downturn, which we wrote about in fear versus greed. The financial side of a leap is exactly what should be mitigated in advance, with a funded runway and a clear plan.

What most people miss

Most people treat the team problem and the personal leap as unrelated. One is a management issue, the other a career issue. They are the same issue wearing two suits. Both come down to a conversation you keep postponing because it is uncomfortable and the discomfort cannot be reasoned away. On the team, it is naming the tension no one will say out loud. In your own life, it is admitting you have outgrown the seat you are in. The leaders who move on either one are not fearless. They just decided that the cost of the unspoken conversation, the hallway talk or the someday-leap, was finally higher than the discomfort of having it. That is the edge, and it is the same edge in both rooms.

A concrete example

Picture a VP leading a six-person team that used to hum and now goes quiet in meetings. The status updates are smooth, but the real debate happens in one-on-ones afterward, and two strong personalities have started routing around each other. Instead of another offsite about "collaboration," the leader starts going first: admitting a call they got wrong, inviting the pushback they used to deflect, and running a pre-mortem on the next big initiative. Within a couple of cycles the disagreement moves back into the room, where it belongs. That same leader, at 49 and eyeing a move of their own, applies the identical logic to their own decision: mitigate what can be mitigated, then stop waiting for a certainty that will never arrive. Same skill, two rooms.

Frequently asked questions

How do I know if my team has outgrown how it works?

Watch for the honest conversation migrating out of the room. If the real debate now happens in the hallway, in one-on-ones, or on Slack during the meeting, and people tense up or go quiet in the group, the way the team works together has stopped fitting the way it needs to perform. Strong one-on-one relationships are your baseline: when someone stops showing up in the group the way they do with you privately, get curious.

What does healthy conflict on a team actually look like?

It looks like disagreement about the work, out loud, without it turning personal, built on enough trust that everyone assumes good intent. Practically, it shows up as pre-mortems ("how could this fail?"), someone assigned to argue the other side, and a leader who invites feedback on themselves. The absence of conflict is not harmony, it is usually avoidance.

What is disagree and commit, and how do I use it?

It means you do not need everyone to agree, you need everyone heard and then aligned on the action. Build toward consensus or at least map where each person stands, let every perspective improve the idea, then make the decision and have the whole team move as one, including the people who argued against it. The rule underneath it: you do not have to like each other, but you do have to respect each other.

How do I know when it's the right time to leave corporate and go out on my own?

There is no data point that will tell you. As our guest put it, you will never have every experience, every dollar, or every box checked first. What you can do is mitigate the financial risk in advance, a funded runway, a clear plan, so the leap is a decision and not a gamble, and then accept the residual fear you cannot analyze away. We walk through the money side of a transition in how high earners can bridge a gap between paychecks, and the emotional side in our video for people tired of corporate but scared to make the move. At Tailored Wealth, mapping that runway is one of the first things we do when a client is weighing a move.

Is this a work problem or a money problem?

Usually both, and they reinforce each other. The courage to have the hard conversation at work and the courage to make your own leap draw on the same muscle, and a solid financial plan is what quiets the second fear enough to act on either.

Who this is for

This is for executives in their 40s and 50s who are leading a team that has outgrown how it used to operate and, often at the same time, quietly weighing a bigger move of their own. If both of those are live for you, the work is the same in each room: stop avoiding the conversation you keep postponing. On the money side, a plan is what turns "someday" into a decision with a date, which is the whole idea behind a hybrid retirement that makes work optional.

Book a Free Wealth Strategy Call

If you are weighing a move and want the financial side mapped so the decision is yours to make on your terms, that is exactly what we do. It is a low-friction conversation about your plan, not a sales pitch. You can also find the full episode, our newsletter, and more at makingsenseofyourmoney.com.

Disclosure

The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon.

No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment.

All investments include a risk of loss that clients should be prepared to bear. The principal risks of Tailored Wealth’s strategies are disclosed in the publicly available Form ADV Part 2A.

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.

Tailored Wealth and its advisors do not provide legal, accounting, or tax advice. Consult your attorney or tax professional.