See if a Wealth
Clarity Chat is
right for you.

Your Sales Comp Plan Is Costing You Millions | Dan Pascone with Kyle Smith | Ep #20

TL;DR

Kyle Smith, Managing Partner of The Bridge Group, explains how he evaluates sales compensation plans for B2B tech companies: keep them simple, make quotas attainable and tie pay to things reps control. He also shares what his benchmarking shows about base-versus-variable splits, why he sees fewer sales leaders trading cash for startup equity, and the personal money lessons he learned about cars, saving and ownership. These are Kyle's observations, not guarantees or universal benchmarks.

For a 40s–50s sales or revenue leader with $500k+ in household income and complex compensation, the planning questions are how much of your pay is guaranteed versus variable, how you value equity as a risk instead of a promise, and whether income growth is turning into savings. We handle these inside Life-Driven Planning, our 6-phase planning approach. This is general education, not individualized advice.

Who Is Kyle Smith?

Kyle Smith is Managing Partner and owner of The Bridge Group, a sales consulting firm that helps technology companies sell more. He says he got into the field by accident: he has a biology degree, planned to pursue an advanced degree in life sciences, then realized he was tired of being poor. A mentor, his aunt, suggested he try sales. He later joined The Bridge Group in 2014 on a whim and, by his account, has been there 11 years.

He describes his path to ownership this way: in 2018 he bought 4% of the firm after proposing an employee buyout with colleagues, and he took a controlling interest 2–3 years before the recording. [VERIFY: ownership details are the guest's]

What The Bridge Group Does and Where Sales Teams Get Stuck

Kyle says the firm's work includes strategic assessments (organizational design, headcount, roles, compensation and supporting technology), playbooks, training, coaching and some interim management. He says fewer than 5% of projects are retainer-based. Most have specific scopes and deliverables, from org design for a 3,500-person global sales organization to building a single outreach cadence for an inbound-only team.

The most common challenge, in his words, is the sales equivalent of technical debt: a structure that was hacked together at each stage of growth. The trigger is often an inflection point, such as a funding round, when a company needs to scale in a more deliberate way. He says buyers have shifted toward larger organizations, so he now works more with Chief Revenue Officers, VPs of Sales and VPs of Marketing than with CEOs of startups.

How Kyle Evaluates a Sales Comp Plan

Kyle starts by comparing the numbers to market benchmarks, including the base and on-target earnings (OTE) split. Then he asks a behavioral question: does the incentive plan drive the behavior the company says it wants? His basics:

  • Simple: Reps shouldn't need to keep their own spreadsheet to confirm they were credited and paid correctly. Kyle says that if the agreement runs 6 pages, something has gone wrong.
  • Attainable: He says about 65% of reps should reach quota on any given team, and he checks that against historical data and benchmarks.
  • In the rep's control: Pay should be tied to factors the rep influences, and attribution should be trackable so credit can be tied to results.

Base vs. Variable: What Kyle Is Seeing

From the benchmarking data his firm collects, Kyle says the mix has drifted toward base pay for about 10 years. Account Executive (AE) plans that were long 50/50 are now about 55/45, and Sales Development Rep (SDR) plans moved from about 60/40 to about 67/33. [VERIFY: guest benchmarks] He gives 2 reasons. Recruiting was intense in the post-COVID tech boom, and heavy incentive pay with accelerators can create risk for finance teams when quotas are set without much historical data.

He says individual contributor plans are formulaic, while executive plans vary widely. A VP of Sales could be at $350,000 or $700,000 in total OTE, with a split closer to 50/50 and a stage-dependent slice of equity. These are Kyle's observations from his own work, not a standard to expect in your next offer.

Why Fewer Executives Are Chasing Startup Equity

Kyle says he's seen a shift in how leaders weigh equity. A decade ago, he says, many knew people who had been part of 8-figure exits and wanted to join them. Now, he says, many know people who took about $150,000 a year below their market value for equity that never materialized, in some cases more than once. He also points to dilution and lower multiples: roughly 13–14x revenue in the boom, versus about 6x now, with fewer acquisitions. [VERIFY: guest figures]

His takeaway is that fewer executives believe they're racing toward an easy $10 million exit from a slice of equity, so they want to be paid now for what they're worth. Dan said that matches what we see in our own work. Equity can still be valuable, but it's best viewed as potential upside rather than a promised outcome. Our equity compensation explainer goes deeper on how the different award types work.

Kyle's Money Story

Kyle comes from a family of entrepreneurs, including contractors and small business owners, and says money was always a topic and never felt like enough. He fell for sales quickly because he could see his effort tied directly to his income. Then came a common pattern: when he started making decent money, his first instinct was to spend it. He says he went through 5 cars in 5 years before buying a house and starting to save toward something meaningful.

For years, he says, his strategy was simply to make more money. That works early, when income grows quickly, but he notes the curve doesn't go on forever for most people. About 5 years before the recording, he shifted to a simple plan: he and his wife max out their 401(k)s, add at least $40,000 a year in after-tax investments, and put money into the business. He calls his wife's grad school an investment.

He says that in hindsight, he wouldn't have bought the cars, and that he and his wife now only make cash purchases of certified pre-owned cars and keep them until repair costs climb. In his experience, writing a $35,000 check changes how you decide compared with a monthly payment. That's his personal approach, not a recommendation, and financing can make sense in some situations. His next goal is saving a down payment for a short-term rental beach house in Maine.

Lightning Round Highlights

  • Coffee or tea: Coffee.
  • Meal for the rest of your life: Pasta.
  • Technology he can't live without: Zoom.
  • Favorite quote: Angela Duckworth in Grit, which he recalls as "Excellence is achieved through monotony" (he says he may be misquoting).
  • Books: He likes core principles in Dave Ramsey's Total Money Makeover (a not-an-endorsement mention) and names Disrupted as his favorite business book.
  • Personal hack: He believes small decisions add up in $50 increments, not just in the $50,000 ones.
  • Bucket list item accomplished: The Maldives.
  • Financial milestone: A $5 million net worth.
  • Advice to his younger self: Save money.
  • How to connect: LinkedIn, where he says he does most of his communicating.

What Most People Miss

  • Equity is a price you pay: Taking less cash for equity means you're pricing a risky, illiquid asset. Dilution, vesting and exit timing all change what the equity is worth, and it can end up worth nothing.

  • Income growth eventually flattens: A strategy of earning more can carry you for years, but it needs a savings and investing plan behind it. Otherwise higher pay mostly funds higher spending.

  • Small, repeated choices compound: Kyle's point about $50 decisions mirrors how we think about spending and saving together. Our post on the 70/20/10 rule shows one way to frame it.

Example (Hypothetical): Cash vs. Equity in a Job Offer

This hypothetical is for illustration only. All figures are assumed, aren't projections or recommendations, and ignore taxes, vesting schedules and liquidation preferences.

Assume a sales executive in her late 40s is weighing 2 offers from private companies. Offer A pays $450,000 a year in total target cash, split 50/50 between base and variable pay (the variable part isn't guaranteed). Offer B pays $300,000 a year in cash plus 2% equity that vests over 4 years.

  • The cash gap: $450,000 minus $300,000 is $150,000 a year, or $600,000 over 4 years before taxes.
  • Dilution: If later funding rounds dilute her 2% by 25%, her effective stake is 1.5%.
  • Break-even: $600,000 divided by 1.5% is a $40 million sale price just to make up the cash she gave up, before taxes.

If the company never sells, or sells for less, the equity may be worth less than the cash she gave up, and possibly nothing. Reasonable people can still choose Offer B for the upside, the role or the stage of their career. The point is to price the trade-off before accepting it. A CPA and an attorney can review the specific award terms and tax treatment.

How This Fits Our Approach at Tailored Wealth

Life-Driven Planning covers 6 phases: Cash Flow, Retirement & Hybrid Retirement, Risk, Expense & Goal, Tax and Legacy. Variable pay, bonus timing and savings rules live in the Cash Flow and Tax phases. Our Equity Compensation Playbook is a set of structured rules for RSUs, stock options (ISOs and NSOs), ESPPs, deferred compensation, AMT and 10b5-1 plans, so each award has a plan for when to hold, when to sell and how to handle taxes. Our 7-minute video on equity compensation is a quick overview.

Life Driven Investing (LDI) builds a portfolio backward from your life using the Four Liquidity Bands: 0–2 years, 3–5 years, 6–10 years and 10+ years. Variable pay makes the 0–2 year band especially important, because a strong commission year doesn't guarantee the next one. Private company equity or an ownership stake like Kyle's buyout sits in the 10+ year band, since it's illiquid and concentrated. Under our Quarterly Strategy Rhythm (ongoing plan updates, decision reviews and rebalancing), we revisit how that mix is holding up. This episode is educational and isn't an endorsement of The Bridge Group or any company or product discussed.

Who This Is For

This episode is for sales and revenue leaders, senior executives and other corporate professionals in their 40s and 50s with $500k+ in household income, variable pay and possibly equity, who want their compensation to turn into a plan. If you're weighing a cash-versus-equity offer, managing income that swings year to year or thinking about ownership in a business, the ideas here are for you.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if my sales comp plan is “too complicated”?

A practical test is to ask a rep to explain their plan back to you in two minutes or less. If they can’t clearly tell you how they earn commission, what triggers accelerators, and how they get credit on deals, it’s probably too complex. Extra red flags include reps running their own spreadsheets to “check” payroll, frequent disputes, and managers having to regularly interpret the plan on one-off calls.

What’s a healthy base vs. variable mix for AEs and SDRs?

There’s no single magic ratio, but in many B2B tech environments AE plans have shifted from ~50/50 toward something closer to ~55/45 (base:variable) over the last decade, while SDR plans have moved from ~60/40 toward ~67/33. The right mix for you depends on your market, sales cycle length, and hiring dynamics, but in general you want enough variable pay to drive behavior without creating undue risk or making roles uncompetitive.

How many reps should be hitting quota?

Kyle uses a rule of thumb that roughly 65% of reps should be at or above quota in a healthy system. If far fewer are getting there, it may signal unrealistic targets, poorly defined territories, misaligned metrics, or process issues upstream. If nearly everyone is dramatically over-achieving, quotas may be too low or your plan may be underpriced relative to the value reps are creating.

What are common mistakes in sales comp design?

Some frequent missteps include: tying pay to metrics that reps don’t fully control, using too many different measures in one plan, ignoring how the plan will be operationalized in your CRM, and neglecting to stress-test scenarios (e.g., what happens if one rep has a breakout year?). Another subtle mistake is failing to align comp with the company’s real strategic objective, like emphasizing new logos when leadership actually cares more about expansion or retention.

Should sales leaders still take big equity over cash tradeoffs?

It depends on your risk tolerance and the company’s trajectory. In frothy markets, leaders often accepted sizable salary cuts in exchange for larger equity grants. After a period of lower revenue multiples, fewer exits, and dilution, many executives have become more cautious, insisting on fair market cash compensation even when equity is part of the package. Equity can still be valuable, but it’s wise to view it as upside, not a guaranteed outcome.

What’s one simple personal finance shift that can help a high-earning seller?

A straightforward move is to separate income growth from lifestyle growth. For example, commit to automatically increasing your 401(k) and after-tax investing whenever you get a raise, instead of letting every bump flow into cars, housing, or discretionary spending. That habit, combined with avoiding high-interest debt and unnecessary financing (like constantly rolling car leases), can dramatically improve your net worth over a decade.

How should I think about taking equity instead of cash in a job offer?

Treat equity as a risky, illiquid upside, not a promised payout. Compare the cash you'd give up over the vesting period with the sale price the equity would need to reach to make up the difference, after dilution and before taxes, as in the hypothetical above. Also ask about vesting, liquidation preferences and what happens if you leave. Our Equity Compensation Playbook starts with those questions, and our 7-minute equity compensation video is a good primer. An attorney and a CPA should review the actual terms.

How can I turn a big commission or bonus year into savings instead of lifestyle?

Decide the rule before the money arrives. For example, you might send a set percentage of every bonus or commission check to savings and investing, and fill tax-advantaged accounts such as your 401(k) up to the annual limits. The IRS publishes 401(k) contribution limits, which change from year to year. Whatever rule you pick, the point is to make saving automatic so higher income doesn't just raise your spending.

How do I plan around variable pay when my income swings from year to year?

A common approach is to build fixed expenses around the part of your pay you can count on and direct variable pay toward goals. We also keep enough in cash and short-term holdings to cover your 0–2 year needs, so a down year doesn't force you to sell investments at a bad time. Bonuses and commissions are often taxed differently at withholding than at filing, so tax planning matters too. If you'd like help building that structure, book a free Wealth Strategy Call with us.

Talk Through Your Own Plan

If you're a high-earning leader with variable pay, equity or an ownership stake and want to see how it all fits together, we'd be glad to talk it through. Book a free Wealth Strategy Call with us, and we'll look at your situation together.

Disclosure

The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon.

No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment.

All investments include a risk of loss that clients should be prepared to bear. The principal risks of Tailored Wealth’s strategies are disclosed in the publicly available Form ADV Part 2A.

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.

Tailored Wealth and its advisors do not provide legal, accounting, or tax advice. Consult your attorney or tax professional.