Frequently Ask Question
Why are mobile home parks considered a strong cash-flow investment?
Mobile home parks combine sticky residents, since moving a home is expensive and difficult, with a structure where the operator typically owns only the land and infrastructure, not the homes themselves. Residents tend to have real pride of ownership and often stay for decades, the operator isn't constantly renovating units between tenants, and lot rents can be relatively resilient in markets with a severe shortage of affordable housing. Together, that combination can translate into more stable, predictable cash flow than some other real estate types, though results always depend on the specific property and operator.
Do residents in mobile home parks actually own their homes?
In the model Kevin describes, yes. Residents own the mobile home itself as personal property, similar to a vehicle, and pay the operator lot rent for the land, utilities, and shared amenities. When they move, they typically sell the home in place to a new buyer, who then takes over the lot lease, rather than hauling the home away. That arrangement tends to encourage longer tenures and more day-to-day care for the property.
Why don't we see many new mobile home parks being built?
Kevin points to two main reasons. Many municipalities associate mobile home parks with outdated negative stereotypes and are reluctant to approve new communities, and parks generally generate less property tax revenue per acre than housing or commercial development, so cities often prefer higher-revenue uses instead. As a result, far more parks are being shut down or redeveloped each year than are built, which shrinks the overall supply over time.
What makes a parking garage or lot a good investment?
Kevin's criteria center on location, price, and upside. He looks for garages in high-growth, dense urban cores with strong demand, that are already cash flowing on day one, and that can be acquired below replacement cost, meaning it would cost more to build the same asset today. From there, he looks for multiple ways to add value: dynamic pricing that charges more during busy periods and less during slow ones, technology and operational upgrades, and safety or aesthetic improvements like lighting and striping.
Longer term, he also values sites where a future higher-and-better use, through air rights or redevelopment, could add upside beyond the current parking income.
How does Kevin's firm structure investments for passive investors?
Details vary by deal and fund, but Kevin describes a typical structure as an 8 to 10% preferred return to investors, with investor capital and any accrued preferred returns repaid in full before the sponsor participates in profits, followed by a 70/30 split of any remaining profit in the limited partners' favor. Historically, it has taken Sunrise around 5 to 6 years to fully return capital and preferred returns before the general partner shares in the upside.
These are the terms of Kevin's own fund's deals, not a template every sponsor uses, so read the actual offering documents for any deal you're considering.
As a passive investor, should I focus on the asset class or the operator?
Kevin is clear that while the asset class matters, the operator matters more. His guidance is to look at the sponsor's track record across a full market cycle, both good times and bad, check their reputation and references with current investors, watch how they communicate during adversity rather than just during wins, and evaluate their balance sheet and risk management rather than their marketing materials and pro format.
A strong operator, the jockey, can make a lot of different asset types work, while a weak one can struggle even in the most popular niche. Our own list of 6 Private Market Questions to Ask First walks through this same due-diligence process in more detail.
Should a corporate executive add mobile home parks or parking to their portfolio?
It depends entirely on the rest of your plan, not on how attractive the return targets sound. Before adding any illiquid, multi-year private real estate commitment, you need clarity on your liquidity timeline, how much of your net worth is already concentrated in employer stock or equity comp, and whether locking up capital for five-plus years actually fits your path toward a hybrid retirement. That's exactly the kind of decision we help clients work through on a Free Wealth Strategy Call.