When Can You Make Work Optional? The Three Clocks That Should Drive the Decision

Written By: Dan Pascone
Home office desk with laptop, notebook, mug, glasses, watch, papers, and a lake view through French doors.
TL;DR: The number that should drive your work-optional date is not your account balance or your life expectancy, it is your healthspan, the high-energy, disability-free years you have left.
- You may have 28 to 32 years of life expectancy at 52, but often only about 7 to 8 healthy, high-agency retirement years.
- Retirement spending drops roughly 23% from your late-50s to your early-70s, concentrated in travel, dining, and experiences.
- The gap between leaving corporate and required minimum distributions at 73 is one of the best tax-planning windows of your life.
- Once the plan says you have enough, waiting mostly costs you healthy years, not risk.
We show one piece of data to almost every new client who is five to ten years out from making work optional. Almost every time, it changes the conversation. Not because it scares them. Because it gives them permission.
Here is the pattern. A senior leader has done everything right. Saved aggressively. Managed equity comp reasonably well. Built a real asset base across taxable, pre-tax, and Roth accounts, maybe some deferred comp. We model the cash flow, the spending, the tax picture, and the plan says they can step back. Not someday. Soon. Then they hesitate. "Let me do two more years." "Let me get to the next vesting cliff." "Let me get comfortable with the number."
That instinct is understandable. But there is a cost to the delay that almost nobody accounts for, and it is not financial. It is a time cost. This article covers the three clocks that actually govern your work-optional decision, and why the risk you are trying to avoid may not be the real risk.

Life Expectancy Is the Wrong Number

Most retirement planning starts with one number: total life expectancy. And that number is long. Social Security Administration data puts a 52-year-old man at roughly 28 more years and a 52-year-old woman at closer to 32. People look at that and think, "I have plenty of time."
But total life expectancy is not the number that should drive your decisions. The question that actually matters is how many disability-free, high-energy, high-agency years you have left.
Research using Health and Retirement Study data found something most executives find jarring. At age 50, US men have roughly 32 remaining years, but only about 27 of those are disability-free. By age 60, that window shrinks to under 19 years for men and under 20 for women. Read that again. From 50 to 60, you do not just spend 10 calendar years. You spend roughly eight to nine of your disability-free years.
Every year you wait is not one less year of pre-retirement. It may be one less year from the part of your life where you have the most energy and the most freedom to use it.

The Three Clocks That Actually Govern the Decision

Total life expectancy is only the first clock, and the least useful one. For a financially independent executive, three clocks are ticking at once:
1. Life expectancy. How many total years you are likely to live. Long, and the number most plans anchor to. 2. Healthspan. How many of those years are disability-free and high-energy. This is the clock that should drive the decision. 3. Healthy retirement years. The years that are both healthy and free of mandatory work, the ones you can actually spend traveling and showing up for family.
The third clock is the one nobody models, and for financially independent executives it is the most important. One study looked at what happens after age 50 across four states: healthy working years, unhealthy working years, healthy retirement years, and unhealthy retirement years. For educated professionals, the estimate came out to roughly 9.6 healthy working years, 4.5 unhealthy working years, and only 7.6 healthy retirement years.
Sit with that. You may have 30 years of life expectancy ahead of you. But the pool of healthy, work-free or partial-work years, the years when you are traveling and showing up for your kids or grandkids, may be closer to seven or eight. That is what changes the conversation every single time.

Your Retirement Spending Is Not a Flat Line

Here is the second piece of data that reshapes the decision. Most financial plans model retirement spending as a flat line: the same budget at 62 as at 78. Real spending does not work that way.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey data shows the pattern clearly:
Age of household
Average annual spending
Change from age 55-64
55-64
~$85,000
baseline
65-74
~$65,000
down ~23%
75+
~$56,000
down ~34%
The categories driving the decline are what you would expect: transportation, dining out, entertainment, and travel. These are the active-lifestyle categories, the ones tied to energy, mobility, and the ability to go. Health care runs the other way, climbing from roughly $6,700 a year in the 55-64 window to over $8,000 in the 75-plus range.
So the money you are afraid to spend at 58 is not the same money you will spend at 78. The planning question is not only whether you have enough. It is whether the money is available during the years you can actually use it. We covered this tension in Oversaving Might Be Your Biggest Expense.

The Tax Window That Closes at 73

A lot of high earners delay their work-optional date because they are worried about taxes. That fear is valid. The conclusion is often backwards.
If you have funded tax-deferred accounts for 20 to 25 years, you are sitting on a meaningful deferred tax liability. Required minimum distributions (RMDs) begin at age 73, and the IRS does not ask permission. On a $3 million pre-tax balance, that is roughly $113,000 of required income at 73, about $149,000 by 80, and roughly $188,000 by 85. All ordinary income, layered on top of Social Security, where up to 85% of your benefit can be taxable at higher income levels.
Which means the gap between leaving corporate and RMDs starting is one of the most valuable planning windows of your financial life. It is where Roth conversions happen at lower brackets, where assets get repositioned, and where lifetime tax drag gets cut meaningfully. Taxes do not disappear in retirement. The question is whether you control the sequence and timing of income before the IRS controls it for you. We ran the side-by-side math on exit years in Why Retiring Earlier Might Actually Leave You Richer.

What Most People Miss

Here is the insight that reframes everything. High earners spend years managing the risk of retiring too early: running out of money, a bad market, an unforeseen expense. That risk is real, and a good plan manages it directly.
But once the plan actually says you have enough, the risk quietly flips. The danger is no longer retiring too early. It is spending your healthiest, most flexible years proving something the numbers have already proven. That is the risk nobody puts on the balance sheet, because it never shows up as a dollar figure. It shows up as the trip you did not take at 58 and can no longer take comfortably at 78.
The delay does not feel like a decision. It feels like prudence. But saying "two more years" three times in a row is a decision, and it spends from the one account you cannot refill: your healthy years.

A Concrete Example: The VP Who Moved His Date Up

We worked with a VP of sales in his mid-50s: high earner, significant equity comp, real pre-tax and taxable balances. On paper, everything looked like two more years, minimum.
When we built the actual road map (the cash flow, the spending curve, the tax picture, the transition income), the math was already there. What he wanted was to leave corporate, wind down over 12 to 24 months, and build a fractional consulting practice. Not because he needed the income, but because he wanted purposeful work on his own terms. The planning gave him the confidence to move the timeline. The fractional work gave him an income bridge that made the early years easier on both cash flow and taxes.
That combination, financial independence plus purposeful, flexible work, is what Hybrid Retirement looks like in practice. Hybrid Retirement is our term for a structured transition where mandatory work drops away, income becomes flexible, and purpose stays intact. Work becomes optional. Purpose does not. We show it modeled step by step in Retire Gradually, Not All at Once.

What It Takes to Move Your Date

Three things have to be in place to move your work-optional date with confidence:
1. A real integrated model. One plan connecting cash flow, tax, equity comp, spending bands, and any flexible-work income, not a portfolio pie chart and a Monte Carlo score. 2. Near-term expenses pre-funded. The first two to three years of spending should never depend on selling long-term assets in a downturn. 3. A multi-year tax road map. A plan covering the next five to ten years of income sequencing and conversions, not just this tax year.
This is where the Four Liquidity Bands do the work. We match money to when you need it: 0-2 years for current needs, 3-5 for short-term goals, 6-10 for mid-term, and 10-plus for the long term. That structure is why the early years never force a sale at the wrong time. We keep it current through a Quarterly Strategy Rhythm, a standing quarterly review so the plan updates as your comp, career, and family timing change.

Frequently asked questions

How do I know if I can actually make work optional, or if I need to keep working?

It is a planning question, not a gut-feel one. When [a real integrated plan](https://yourtailoredwealth.com/2026/02/23/real-financial-plan-vs-portfolio-what-high-earners-need/) shows your cash flow, spending by decade, income sequence, and tax road map all lining up, the decision stops being a feeling and becomes a plan. Most executives we work with at Tailored Wealth are surprised how much earlier the math supports stepping back once flexible income and a liquidity buffer are in the picture.

Does retirement spending really go down as you age?

For most households, yes. BLS data shows average spending falling from around $85,000 in the 55-64 range to about $56,000 at 75-plus, a drop concentrated in travel, dining, and other active-lifestyle categories. Health care is the exception and tends to rise. This is exactly why front-loading discretionary spending into your healthy years, rather than deferring it, is often the better plan.

Should I work two more years to be safe?

Sometimes the extra years genuinely help, for example when equity vesting is steep or employer healthcare bridges a gap before Medicare. But if the plan already says you have enough, "two more years" often buys certainty you do not need at the cost of healthy years you cannot get back. The honest answer comes from modeling both paths side by side.

Why is the period before age 73 so important for taxes?

Because required minimum distributions start at 73 and force ordinary income onto your return whether you want it or not. The years between leaving corporate and that point are when you can convert pre-tax dollars at lower brackets and reposition assets, cutting lifetime tax drag. A real plan treats your exit year as a tax decision, not only a lifestyle one.

What is Hybrid Retirement, and how is it different from early retirement?

Hybrid Retirement is a structured transition where mandatory work ends but optional, purposeful income continues, through consulting, fractional roles, board seats, or a passion project. Unlike a hard stop at 65, it keeps income flexible and purpose intact while dropping the intensity. It is the approach Tailored Wealth builds for executives who are done with corporate but not done contributing.

Who This Is For

This is written for corporate executives and senior leaders in their 40s and 50s, typically with $500,000-plus in household income and complex compensation: RSUs, deferred comp, and meaningful pre-tax and taxable balances. If you are five to ten years from a possible exit, have saved well, and keep adding "just two more years," this is the data that reframes the decision. If you are early in your career and still building the base, this is not yet your chapter.

If you want to see your version of this data (your healthspan window, your spending curve, your tax picture, your work-optional timeline), we will map your specific situation and show you what is actually possible.

Book a Free Wealth Strategy Call

Disclosure

The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon.

No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment.

All investments include a risk of loss that clients should be prepared to bear. The principal risks of Tailored Wealth's strategies are disclosed in the publicly available Form ADV Part 2A.

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur. All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability, or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.

Tailored Wealth and its advisors do not provide legal, accounting, or tax advice. Consult your attorney or tax professional.